November 8, 2009
With the disastrous Copenhagen treaty in sight, selling the overpopulation story is obviously considered crucial for the agenda. After all, the entire climate change mythology depends in the end on the role of man as a scourge on the environment. So, it follows, less people means less global warming. But the agenda has hit a snag. Whenever people are confronted by those who tell us that we are to die if mother earth is to survive, alarm-bells go off warning us that all is not well. This danger sign is not there for nothing. Human instinct has had many centuries of experience with bloodthirsty tyrants, and therefore tends to rebel against tyranny approaching. All propaganda now serves to subdue this human instinct, lest the ‘global citizens’ stop the unfolding of the agenda in its tracks and bring forth the ropes.
During a visit to India in July of this year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton revealed not only the administration’s commitment to tackle ‘global climate change’, but also her willingness to link it to overpopulation. After a roundtable discussion with Indian Minister for Environment Jairam Ramesh, Clinton openly pondered this supposed link:
“One of the participants”, Clinton stated, “pointed out that it’s rather odd to talk about climate change and what we must do to stop and prevent the ill effects without talking about population and family planning.”
“That was an incredibly important point”, she added. “And yet, we talk about these things in very separate and often unconnected ways.”
Clinton’s comments are no spontaneous thought-experiment, falling out of the clear blue sky. Just a couple of months earlier Mrs. Clinton accepted the Margaret Sanger Award out of the hands of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), professing deep admiration for eugenicist Maragret Sanger. Clinton stated:
“I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision, (…). I am really in awe of her.”
These recent comments made by Clinton reflect the mindset of the neo-Malthusian scientists currently occupying key positions in the Obama administration. It also shows that entire populations become policy tools by which the key players can extend or withhold financial aid, depending on the efforts made by UN member states to ‘stabilize’ their populations. As Mr. Ramesh recently stated at a conference in the Indian capital:
“(There is a) move in western countries to bring population into climate change (negotiations). Influential American think-tanks are asking why should we reward profligate reproductive behaviour? Why should we reward India which is adding 14 million people every year?”
It may not come as a complete surprise to those who have studied the matter in some depth. The same Malthusian idea that triggered eugenics in the past now inspires the current environmentalist movement pushing global carbon taxes and other supranational measures, supposedly to ‘curb our carbon footprint’.
A couple of months before Clinton’s statements, BBC reported on the comments by Clinton advisor Nina Fedoroff, who stated before BBC One Planet:
“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people. There are probably already too many people on the planet.”
These kinds of horror stories attract a wide variety of well-meaning idiots, anxious to save the planet but failing to realize that they are parroting the arguments of tyrants. Actress Daryl Hannah, for example, in her quest to save the world’s oceans recently confided to a reporter:
“We need to get the population under control. It’s the ‘elephant in the room’ that nobody wants to address. We need to stop breeding. … if you want more (than one or two) kids, adopt them. There are plenty of kids… who need warm, loving homes.”
What we are witnessing here is the true mindset and ambition of the globalists, parroted by their useful idiots, namely to reduce the world’s population the sooner the better. As the elite often admit, the current fixation on CO2 is just a pretext in order to get the job done. Copenhagen provides the new world order with the global architecture necessary to implement the measures it sees fit in order to reach its desired endgame. It will begin with globally implemented taxes. Then, when all pieces have moved into their respective positions, the hatches will appear.